Assessing Health Impacts of Food Industry Chemicals

This analysis investigates the health implications of food industry chemicals, identifying common substances and examining their effects on human health, while also looking into natural alternatives such as essential oils for safer food preservation.

I. Introduction

The food industry uses a variety of chemicals for food preservation, packaging, and processing. These substances include insecticides, antibiotics, preservatives, and additives. However, the presence of chemical residues in food products entails health hazards, emphasizing the significance of studying the health consequences of these compounds (Lebelo et al., 2021). To mitigate these dangers, there is a rising movement in the food sector to replace harmful chemicals with safer alternatives. Enzymes such as xylanase, cellulase, and pectinase are being studied as alternatives to toxic chemicals in food production (Kumar et al., 2020).

Essential oils are also being acknowledged as natural alternatives to chemical preservatives due to their antibacterial capabilities (Ju et al., 2018). This shift toward natural preservatives is primarily motivated by customer preferences and regulatory requirements to reduce the use of harmful substances in food items. Furthermore, the migration of chemical compounds from packing materials into food, especially under different heating and storage settings, is a major concern for food safety (Bhunia et al., 2013; Ibarra et al., 2018).

The food sector is also looking at enhanced preservation technologies to keep nutrients in fruits and vegetables, emphasizing the significance of maintaining food quality while assuring safety (Barrett and Lloyd, 2011). Furthermore, glycosides and other natural surfactants are being considered for various applications in the food sector due to their commercial significance and possible benefits (Dembitsky, 2004; Roode et al., 2003).

Because the food business relies so heavily on chemicals, a thorough understanding of their effects on food safety and human health is essential. The industry’s continual move to natural alternatives and safer techniques demonstrates its commitment to guaranteeing food safety while satisfying consumer demand for healthier and more sustainable food products.

II. Common Chemicals Used

Chemicals commonly employed in the food business include lactic acid, essential oils, bacteriocins, and preservatives such as bisphenol A. Lactic acid is used as a taste enhancer, acidifier, and preservative in many culinary products. Cabrera-González et al. (2022; Djukic-Vukovic et al., 2011). Essential oils have antibacterial qualities that help prevent foodborne infections and increase the shelf life of processed foods (Kim et al., 1995; Viuda-Martos et al., 2008). Bacteriocins generated from bacteria are used as bio-preservatives in food to avoid rotting (Vaishali et al. 2019). BPA, which can be found in food and beverage containers, canned food linings, impact-resistant safety equipment, thermal paper, toys, compact discs, medical gadgets, and dental sealants, raises concerns about potential health dangers (Barraza, 2013).

Furthermore, the food business makes considerable use of natural food additives to preserve food quality and avoid spoiling. Herbs, spices, vinegar, and fermentation products are among the additions that contribute significantly to food longevity (Carocho et al., 2015). Furthermore, modifying starches, such as potato starch, using new technologies increases their functional qualities, making them useful as stabilizing agents and thickeners in food items (Guillén, 2021).

Chemical stability boosters, such as papain derived from papaya latex, find use in pharmaceutical and industrial products, demonstrating their adaptability across industries (Channamade et al., 2021). Furthermore, the use of highly concentrated sweeteners in food products demands probabilistic modeling to estimate human exposure and ensure customer safety (Arcella et al., 2003).

The food industry uses a wide range of chemicals for a variety of goals, including as flavor enhancement, preservation, and functional improvement. Understanding the presence and effects of these compounds is critical for maintaining food safety, quality, and consumer health.

III. Health Impacts

The usage of chemicals in the food business can have serious consequences for human health. Chemicals included in food production processes have been linked to a variety of health impacts, according to studies. For example, the modernization of agriculture has resulted in an increase in the usage of pesticides, potentially causing neurotoxicity, endocrine disruption, and reproductive system disruption (Kumar et al. 2020). Furthermore, food contamination with mycotoxins caused by fungal development poses a significant concern, with negative consequences for human health (Singh et al., 2021).

The extensive use of chemicals like bisphenol A (BPA) in food packaging materials raises concerns about potential health consequences, such as neurodevelopmental abnormalities, birth weight issues, and endocrine system disturbances (Mikołajewska et al., 2015). The use of food additives, while necessary to meet market demands, must be carefully considered due to its possible toxicity and health impact (Carocho et al., 2014). Furthermore, the presence of unknown nanostructures generated during high-temperature food processing can lead to negative physiological consequences and health hazards (Mmehime et al., 2018).

On the plus side, natural alternatives such as essential oils have been investigated for their antibacterial characteristics, suggesting that they could be used as green preservatives to improve food safety against mycotoxin contamination (Singh et al., 2021). Bio-preservation approaches using essential oils from spices have demonstrated antibacterial action, improving food safety (Viuda-Martos et al., 2008). The use of lactic acid bacteria for mycotoxin detoxification in food is a promising strategy to reducing the health concerns associated with mycotoxins (Nasrollahzadeh et al., 2022).

In conclusion, while chemicals play an important role in food production, it is critical to evaluate their potential health consequences. Research on natural alternatives, detoxifying procedures, and bio-preservation techniques highlights the industry’s efforts to address health risks related with chemical use in food production.

References

Barrett, D. and Lloyd, B. (2011). Advanced preservation methods and nutrient retention in fruits and vegetables. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 92(1), 7-22. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.4718

Bhunia, K., Sablani, S., Tang, J., & Rasco, B. (2013). Migration of chemical compounds from packaging polymers during microwave, conventional heat treatment, and storage. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 12(5), 523-545. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12028

Dembitsky, V. (2004). Astonishing diversity of natural surfactants: 1. glycosides of fatty acids and alcohols. Lipids, 39(10), 933-953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11745-004-1316-1

Hossain, F., Follett, P., Vu, K., Harich, M., Salmieri, S., & Lacroix, M. (2016). Evidence for synergistic activity of plant-derived essential oils against fungal pathogens of food. Food Microbiology, 53, 24-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2015.08.006

Ibarra, V., Sendón, R., García-Fonte, X., Losada, P., & Quirós, A. (2018). Migration studies of butylated hydroxytoluene, tributyl acetylcitrate and dibutyl phthalate into food simulants. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 99(4), 1586-1595. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.9337

Ju, J., Xie, Y., Guo, Y., Cheng, Y., Qian, H., & Yao, W. (2018). The inhibitory effect of plant essential oils on foodborne pathogenic bacteria in food. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 59(20), 3281-3292. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2018.1488159

Kumar, M., Kumar, P., Das, P., Solanki, R., & Kapur, M. (2020). Potential applications of extracellular enzymes from streptomyces spp. in various industries. Archives of Microbiology, 202(7), 1597-1615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-020-01898-9

Lebelo, K., Malebo, N., Mochane, M., & Masinde, M. (2021). Chemical contamination pathways and the food safety implications along the various stages of food production: a review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(11), 5795. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115795

Roode, B., Franssen, M., Padt, A., & Boom, R. (2003). Perspectives for the industrial enzymatic production of glycosides. Biotechnology Progress, 19(5), 1391-1402. https://doi.org/10.1021/bp030038q

Arcella, D., Soggiu, M., & Leclercq, C. (2003). Probabilistic modelling of human exposure to intense sweeteners in italian teenagers: validation and sensitivity analysis of a probabilistic model including indicators of market share and brand loyalty. Food Additives & Contaminants, 20(sup001), S73-S86. https://doi.org/10.1080/0265203031000134974

Barraza, L. (2013). A new approach for regulating bisphenol a for the protection of the public’s health. The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics, 41(S1), 9-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/jlme.12030

Cabrera-González, M., Ahmed, A., Maamo, K., Salem, M., Jordan, C., & Harasek, M. (2022). Evaluation of nanofiltration membranes for pure lactic acid permeability. Membranes, 12(3), 302. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12030302

Carocho, M., Morales, P., & Ferreira, I. (2015). Natural food additives: quo vadis?. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 45(2), 284-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2015.06.007

Channamade, C., Raju, J., Vijayaprakash, S., Bora, R., & Shekhar, N. (2021). Promise approach on chemical stability enhancement of papain by encapsulation system: a review. Journal of Young Pharmacists, 13(2), 87-90. https://doi.org/10.5530/jyp.2021.13.20

Djukic-Vukovic, J., Mojovic, V., Pejin, D., Vukašinović-Sekulić, M., Rakin, M., Nikolic, S., … & Pejin, J. (2011). New trends and challenges in lactic acid production on renewable biomass. Hemijska Industrija, 65(4), 411-422. https://doi.org/10.2298/hemind110114022d

Guillén, J. (2021). Modification of potato starch by emerging technologies. Tropical Agricultural Research, 32(4), 480. https://doi.org/10.4038/tar.v32i4.8516

Jhandai, P., Jadhav, V., & Gupta, R. (2019). Bio-preservation of foods: a review. European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety, 164-174. https://doi.org/10.9734/ejnfs/2019/v11i430159

Kim, J., Marshall, M., & Wei, C. (1995). Antibacterial activity of some essential oil components against five foodborne pathogens. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 43(11), 2839-2845. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00059a013

Viuda‐Martos, M., Ruiz-Navajas, Y., & Fernández‐López, J. (2008). Antibacterial activity of different essential oils obtained from spices widely used in mediterranean diet. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 43(3), 526-531. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2006.01489.x

Carocho, M., Barreiro, M., Morales, P., & Ferreira, I. (2014). Adding molecules to food, pros and cons: a review on synthetic and natural food additives. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 13(4), 377-399. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12065

Mikołajewska, K., Stragierowicz, J., & Gromadzińska, J. (2015). Bisphenol a – application, sources of exposure and potential risks in infants, children and pregnant women. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health. https://doi.org/10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00343

Mmehime, F., Alagwu, D., Ezekwe, A., Nwankwo, A., & Alagwu, E. (2018). Food chemicals induces toxic effect on health: overview. Pharmaceutical and Biosciences Journal, 33-37. https://doi.org/10.20510/ukjpb/6/i4/177338

Nasrollahzadeh, A., Mokhtari, S., Khomeiri, M., & Saris, P. (2022). Mycotoxin detoxification of food by lactic acid bacteria. International Journal of Food Contamination, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40550-021-00087-w

Singh, B., Tiwari, S., & Dubey, N. (2021). Essential oils and their nanoformulations as green preservatives to boost food safety against mycotoxin contamination of food commodities: a review. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 101(12), 4879-4890. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.11255